Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.08% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	16.1% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

2 years ago, 24 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-2150 APU 16 User benchmarks, average bench 20% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.05 GHz, turbo 1.05 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	15.7% Very poor	Memory 28.8 1-Core 8.4 2-Core 17.2 14% 18.1 Pts	4-Core 15 8-Core 24.9 2% 20 Pts	64-Core 22.7 1% 22.7 Pts
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 15.7% Great: 27%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 8210 4,832 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Biostar(1565 170A) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 20.10.35.02 Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	1.08% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 2.7 Parallax 1.5 1% 1.8 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 0.5 Splatting 2 1% 1.5 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.08% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Hs-ssd-c100 120G 120GB 4,962 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 68GB free (System drive) Firmware: 0200Hf10 SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 62 51 34 37 45 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	16.1% Very poor	Read 111 Write 108 Mixed 63.5 SusWrite 45 18% 81.8 MB/s	4K Read 12.9 4K Write 8 4K Mixed 5.2 30% 8.7 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 16.1% Great: 98%
Seagate ST3500830SCE 500GB 1,034 User benchmarks, average bench 32% 434GB free Firmware: 3.AAC Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Read 66.8 Mixed 37.9 40% 52.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 0.9 4K Mixed 0.6 96% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EBJ41UF8BOW0-GN-F 1x4GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (8^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	8.61% Terrible	MC Read 3.2 MC Write 3 MC Mixed 3.5 9% 3.23 GB/s	SC Read 0.2 SC Write 0.5 SC Mixed 0.5 1% 0.4 GB/s	Latency 262 15% 262 ns
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 8.61% Great: 35%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
E1-2150 APUAMDBench 20%, 16 samples	1x

GPU
HD 8210AMDBench 1%, 4,832 samples	1x

RAM
EWB4GB681PAE-16IC 1x4GBUnknownBench 25%, 248 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16