Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 101%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics50.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive77% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory28 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220224
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '22 at 09:05
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600X-$151
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Memory 89.6
1-Core 152
2-Core 304
99% 182 Pts
4-Core 604
8-Core 871
92% 737 Pts
64-Core 1097
68% 1097 Pts
Poor: 83%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1356 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 22.3.1
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
50.7% Above average
Lighting 64.1
Reflection 62.8
Parallax 87.6
52% 71.5 fps
MRender 61.9
Gravity 70.5
Splatting 46.8
48% 59.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 50.7%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SUV500480G 480GB
412GB free
Firmware: 003056RI
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 212 176 161 164 171 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60% Good
Read 391
Write 351
Mixed 327
SusWrite 209
72% 320 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 32.3
4K Mixed 24.6
81% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 186
DQ Mixed 114
95% 134 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60%
Great: 95%
Kingston SUV500480G 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: 003056RI
SusWrite @10s intervals: 379 202 170 166 171 167 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
65.8% Good
Read 427
Write 394
Mixed 363
SusWrite 209
78% 348 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 35.2
4K Mixed 29
94% 29.9 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 187
DQ Mixed 116
96% 135 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 95%
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 1TB-$102
676GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 463 442 406 436 481 453 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 371
Write 406
Mixed 276
SusWrite 447
85% 375 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 65.6
4K Mixed 15.8
84% 33.6 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 169
143% 206 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 77%
Great: 120%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
2TB free
Firmware: 22.00B22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 195 193 197 196 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
113% Outstanding
Read 197
Write 182
Mixed 91.6
SusWrite 195
122% 166 MB/s
4K Read 2.3
4K Write 4
4K Mixed 0.9
270% 2.4 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 113%
Great: 67%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 12TB
11TB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 152 152 152 152 152 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 29% Great: 120%
Hitachi HUS724030ALE640 3TB
1.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 152 152 153 152 152 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.7% Good
Read 147
Write 150
Mixed 66.3
SusWrite 150
172% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.8
112% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 61.7%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3266 MHz
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
98.3% Outstanding
MC Read 42.5
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 38.4
100% 35.2 GB/s
SC Read 31
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 37
88% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 67.8
59% 67.8 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 98.3%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS Builds (Compare 6,832 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 97% - Outstanding Total price: $945
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $269Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback