To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 53%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory13 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200629
Uptime0 Days
Run DateApr 24 '22 at 16:03
Run Duration122 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2400-$250
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
53% Above average
Memory 74.1
1-Core 75.6
2-Core 140
58% 96.5 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 218
26% 200 Pts
64-Core 249
15% 249 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 53%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
VaIuetech-SSD/256G 256GB
2GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1022A0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2706
Write 26.5
Mixed 56.7
193% 930 MB/s
4K Read 295
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 3.9
453% 100 MB/s
Poor: 31% Great: 80%
Generic External 640GB
465GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 14 13 17 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
7.88% Terrible
Read 24.5
Write 21.2
Mixed 13.8
SusWrite 15.2
24% 18.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.4
25% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.88%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
45.5% Average
MC Read 16.5
MC Write 16.8
MC Mixed 14.5
46% 15.9 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 12.8
SC Mixed 14.7
38% 13.3 GB/s
Latency 92.3
43% 92.3 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 45.5%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,613 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $124Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback