Today's hottest deals

HP EliteBook 8770w

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics7.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive63.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteBook 8770w  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 176C
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130520
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMay 25 '22 at 00:48
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 94%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820QM-$275
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
52.6% Above average
Memory 76.5
1-Core 69.1
2-Core 121
55% 88.8 Pts
4-Core 171
8-Core 158
22% 164 Pts
64-Core 171
11% 171 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K3000M
HP(103C 176C) 2GB
CLim: 653 MHz, MLim: 700 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 385.73
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
7.56% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 12.9
Parallax 11.2
7% 10.8 fps
MRender 12.6
Gravity 11.4
Splatting 10.4
9% 11.5 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 7.56%
Great: 8%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RX7 2.5 256GB
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2201XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 394 398 383 103 148 125 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
63.9% Good
Read 379
Write 235
Mixed 333
SusWrite 258
68% 301 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 40.1
4K Mixed 23.7
83% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 66.5
DQ Write 264
DQ Mixed 128
109% 153 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 63.9%
Great: 84%
Seagate ST500VT000-1DK142 500GB
347GB free
Firmware: 0001SDC1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 106 107 108 108 108 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
63.3% Good
Read 114
Write 113
Mixed 53.1
SusWrite 107
71% 96.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.6
102% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
30.5% Below average
MC Read 11.3
MC Write 9.6
MC Mixed 8.5
28% 9.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 11.2
SC Mixed 9.9
30% 10.3 GB/s
Latency 87.2
46% 87.2 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteBook 8770w Builds (Compare 576 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8770w

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $100
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $296WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $209Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback