Today's hottest deals

bin bin

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 60%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics72.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive70.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory56GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 56GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory48.7 GB free of 56 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, , 1536 x 864 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime1.3 Days
Run DateMay 31 '22 at 14:17
Run Duration213 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7V12 64-Core
None, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.45 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
73.8% Very good
Memory 65.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 221
72% 132 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 850
76% 644 Pts
64-Core 866
54% 866 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 73.8%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Tesla T4
Nvidia(10DE 12A2) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1590 MHz, MLim: 2500 MHz, Ram: 15GB, Driver: 472.39
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
72.9% Very good
Lighting 86.2
Reflection 112
Parallax 96.7
70% 98.1 fps
MRender 105
Gravity 86.8
Splatting 94.5
78% 95.5 fps
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 80%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 537GB
162GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 0 50 164 160 160 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
70.4% Very good
Read 505
Write 118
Mixed 238
SusWrite 88.9
52% 237 MB/s
4K Read 72.1
4K Write 14.1
4K Mixed 21.9
145% 36 MB/s
DQ Read 129
DQ Write 14.1
DQ Mixed 25.6
30% 56.3 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 70%
Virtual HD 378GB
294GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 0 33 487 486 489 487 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.7% Excellent
Read 502
Write 446
Mixed 486
SusWrite 330
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 31.1
4K Write 54.3
4K Mixed 39.4
126% 41.6 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 125
95% 128 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 86%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 56GB
null MHz
1024, 32767, 23553 MB
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
121% Outstanding
MC Read 50.6
MC Write 38.8
MC Mixed 54.9
138% 48.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.5
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 28
61% 21.4 GB/s
Latency 112
36% 112 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 121%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,995 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $322
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $337WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback