Today's hottest deals

Asus M5A97 R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics0.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M5A97 R2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120917
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateMay 31 '22 at 15:25
Run Duration175 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 11%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-4100-$110
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
57% Above average
Memory 83.2
1-Core 66.4
2-Core 122
57% 90.4 Pts
4-Core 181
8-Core 183
24% 182 Pts
64-Core 180
11% 180 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 57%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 GS
Sapphire(174B 8050) 256MB
Ram: 256MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.51% Terrible
Lighting 0.5
Reflection 0.3
Parallax 0.6
0% 0.47 fps
MRender 1.1
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 0.9
1% 0.87 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.51%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HDS721010CLA630 1TB
883GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JP4OA41A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 71 40 24 26 42 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
43.5% Average
Read 109
Write 115
Mixed 67.9
SusWrite 41.9
62% 83.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
150% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 43.5%
Great: 76%
PNY USB 2.0 FD 32GB
23GB free, PID 005b
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 3.3 3.2 4.2 1.9 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
5.03% Terrible
Read 22.5
Write 1.5
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 3
9% 9.18 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 5.03%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DHX DDR3 1600 C8 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
42.2% Average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 11.7
MC Mixed 15.2
42% 14.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.8
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 13.2
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 42.2%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M5A97 R2.0 Builds (Compare 2,894 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus M5A97 R2.0 - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $369
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback