Asus Crosshair IV Formula

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Crosshair IV Formula  (all builds)
Memory6.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120914
Uptime3.4 Days
Run DateMar 01 '18 at 17:42
Run Duration192 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X6 1100T-$340
AM3, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
65.1% Good
Memory 89
1-Core 56.4
2-Core 112
55% 85.7 Pts
4-Core 225
8-Core 336
35% 280 Pts
64-Core 332
21% 332 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 65.1%
Great: 66%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
Sapphire(174B 3000) 3GB
CLim: 950 MHz, MLim: 1425 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 18.2.2
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
35.4% Below average
Lighting 46.2
Reflection 30.7
Parallax 58.2
38% 45.1 fps
MRender 29.5
Gravity 45
Splatting 38.2
31% 37.6 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 35.4%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
100GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
69.8% Good
Read 402
Write 334
Mixed 335
79% 357 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 52.1
4K Mixed 19.9
106% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 35.2
DQ Write 56
DQ Mixed 18.9
22% 36.7 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 69.8%
Great: 124%
WD WD20EURS-63S48Y0 2TB
298GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
58.9% Above average
Read 94.6
Write 111
Mixed 60.8
66% 88.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.16
4K Write 1.52
4K Mixed 0.14
50% 0.61 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 77%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
222GB free
Firmware: 3.ADG Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
24.2% Poor
Read 41.4
Write 42.8
Mixed 49.9
34% 44.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.45
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.25
65% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 24.2%
Great: 43%
ASMT 2105 2TB
178GB free, PID 5136
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing as expected (42nd percentile)
35.1% Below average
Read 71.2
Write 84.9
Mixed 68.9
98% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.38
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.16
75% 0.85 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 35.1%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Dominator DHX DDR3 1600 C8 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.7% Below average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 11.9
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 5.9
SC Mixed 8
20% 7.07 GB/s
Latency 68.5
58% 68.5 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Crosshair IV Formula Builds (Compare 281 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus Crosshair IV Formula

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $520
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback