Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics16.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemAsus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160128
Uptime15.1 Days
Run DateOct 08 '17 at 11:39
Run Duration167 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
78.8% Very good
Memory 88.3
1-Core 106
2-Core 208
77% 134 Pts
4-Core 401
8-Core 402
54% 401 Pts
64-Core 405
25% 405 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 78.8%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
Asus(1043 86CE) 2GB
CLim: 1124 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 375.63
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
16.1% Very poor
Lighting 21.3
Reflection 16.3
Parallax 17.2
17% 18.3 fps
MRender 12
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 16
14% 16.8 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 480GB-$39
301GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41200RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Read 498
Write 337
Mixed 316
85% 383 MB/s
4K Read 35.9
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 13.7
107% 38.9 MB/s
DQ Read 36.9
DQ Write 72.5
DQ Mixed 41.6
35% 50.3 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 108%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$26
924GB free
Firmware: MS2OA7L0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 176
Mixed 180
134% 177 MB/s
4K Read 0.73
4K Write 1.87
4K Mixed 0.2
88% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
1TB free, PID a202
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
44.2% Average
Read 116
Write 98.5
Mixed 102
133% 105 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 1.88
4K Mixed 0.17
72% 0.86 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 49%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
927GB free, PID 2312
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
45.6% Average
Read 106
Write 109
Mixed 83.3
126% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.54
4K Write 2.11
4K Mixed 0.29
84% 0.98 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 45.6%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA41GU6AFR8N-TF 1315 CT8G4DFD8213.M16FB 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
79% Very good
MC Read 28.6
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 25.7
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 17.1
SC Write 29.8
SC Mixed 24.6
68% 23.8 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 79%
Great: 79%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD Builds (Compare 1,509 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Asus M32CD_A_F_K20CD_K31CD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $107
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $336
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback