Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8309
Memory8.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200708
Uptime7.1 Days
Run DateJun 07 '22 at 22:21
Run Duration193 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU 31%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1400-$67
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
61.1% Good
Memory 67.1
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 172
62% 109 Pts
4-Core 297
8-Core 494
48% 396 Pts
64-Core 477
30% 477 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 61.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$256
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 120
Parallax 124
107% 125 fps
MRender 145
Gravity 104
Splatting 89.7
90% 113 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVLW128HEGR-000H1 128GB
9GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB70H1Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1628
Write 546
Mixed 520
195% 898 MB/s
4K Read 42.1
4K Write 72.9
4K Mixed 51.8
169% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 589
DQ Write 416
DQ Mixed 535
391% 514 MB/s
Poor: 101% Great: 317%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
260GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 141 139 139 140 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
79.3% Very good
Read 139
Write 109
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 138
86% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
198% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 79.3%
Great: 109%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
17GB free
Firmware: 3.AAE
SusWrite @10s intervals: 20 30 31 30 29 29 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
11.3% Very poor
Read 11.2
Write 21.2
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 28.2
16% 20.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
36% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 43%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$38
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 209 209 207 206 207 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
97.6% Outstanding
Read 138
Write 174
Mixed 77.1
SusWrite 203
108% 148 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
114% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 97.6%
Great: 106%
SDHC Card 4GB
3GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 10 11 11 11 11 11 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
6.15% Terrible
Read 16.1
Write 8.2
Mixed 6.2
SusWrite 11
13% 10.4 MB/s
4K Read 6
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
22% 2 MB/s
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.15%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown PSD48G240081 Hynix HMA81GU6AFR8N-UH 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.4% Below average
MC Read 13.2
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 11.5
34% 11.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 12.3
28% 9.9 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 34.4%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx Builds (Compare 1,385 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht

System: HP OMEN by HP Desktop PC 880-p0xx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $291
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback