Asus H170M-E D3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics56.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive184% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (52%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H170M-E D3  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160922
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 20 '22 at 10:01
Run Duration278 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 52%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600-$122
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 114
2-Core 227
79% 141 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 424
58% 432 Pts
64-Core 416
26% 416 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Zotac(19DA 3451) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing below potential (72nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
56.5% Above average
Lighting 70
Reflection 72.6
Parallax 64.8
57% 69.1 fps
MRender 68.1
Gravity 69.7
Splatting 66
56% 67.9 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 56.5%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate FireCuda 520 SSD ZP500GM30002 500GB
276GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STNSC014
SusWrite @10s intervals: 902 486 449 479 485 485 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
184% Outstanding
Read 1,463
Write 1,607
Mixed 1,431
SusWrite 548
284% 1,262 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 61.3
207% 70.9 MB/s
DQ Read 748
DQ Write 485
DQ Mixed 558
432% 597 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 184%
Great: 387%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
229GB free
Firmware: EMT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 299 298 299 299 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
99.8% Outstanding
Read 452
Write 420
Mixed 345
SusWrite 313
86% 382 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 69.1
4K Mixed 48.3
155% 51.5 MB/s
DQ Read 338
DQ Write 296
DQ Mixed 317
238% 317 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 99.8%
Great: 124%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
463GB free
Firmware: 1AA01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 69 67 69 67 51 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
36.3% Below average
Read 61.8
Write 67.3
Mixed 57.1
SusWrite 64.2
46% 62.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 1.1
185% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.3%
Great: 62%
Toshiba DT01ABA300 3TB
83GB free
Firmware: MZ6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 99 100 101 102 100 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 143
Write 132
Mixed 58.8
SusWrite 99.8
79% 109 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 88%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$106
159GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 87 90 92 91 94 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
53.3% Above average
Read 94
Write 90
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 91.3
54% 74.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
152% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 53.3%
Great: 108%
Generic External 1TB
409GB free, PID 1840
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 42 42 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 41.2
Write 39.7
Mixed 33.4
SusWrite 41.5
53% 39 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 25%
ST2000LM 015-2E8174 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 42 42 42 42 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
18.9% Very poor
Read 38.4
Write 40
Mixed 32.8
SusWrite 41.7
52% 38.2 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
68% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
60.1% Good
MC Read 21.8
MC Write 22.3
MC Mixed 19.5
61% 21.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 19.8
SC Mixed 18.2
51% 17.7 GB/s
Latency 77.4
52% 77.4 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 60.1%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170M-E D3 Builds (Compare 413 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H170M-E D3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $107
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback