MSI MS-16F3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive66.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star GT60
MotherboardMSI MS-16F3  (all builds)
Memory12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130121
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateDec 27 '17 at 05:34
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
67.6% Good
Memory 82.7
1-Core 89.8
2-Core 170
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 285
8-Core 433
44% 359 Pts
64-Core 435
27% 435 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 670M
MSI(1462 10CB) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 23.21.13.8871
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
10.6% Very poor
Lighting 12.6
Reflection 15
Parallax 11.2
10% 12.9 fps
MRender 16.5
Gravity 12.9
Splatting 12.4
11% 13.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.6%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk SSD Plus 240GB-$30
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: Z22000RL Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
66.6% Good
Read 509
Write 364
Mixed 420
96% 431 MB/s
4K Read 17.1
4K Write 48.3
4K Mixed 4.19
57% 23.2 MB/s
DQ Read 193
DQ Write 179
DQ Mixed 26.4
64% 133 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 66.6%
Great: 86%
Seagate Laptop SSHD 2.5" 1TB-$41
748GB free
Firmware: SM30 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
61.5% Good
Read 101
Write 112
Mixed 104
80% 106 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 5.47
4K Mixed 0.78
217% 2.32 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 61.5%
Great: 65%
ST2000LM 015-2E8174 2TB
2TB free, PID 0621
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
50% Above average
Read 118
Write 126
Mixed 76.8
135% 107 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.17
68% 1.08 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 50%
Great: 50%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR512X64D3S13C9G 830B M2S4G64CB8HG5N-DI 830B M2S4G64CB8HG5N-DI 830B M2S4G64CB8HG5N-DI 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
49.1% Average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15.4
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 16.5
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 75.7
53% 75.7 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MS-16F3 Builds (Compare 99 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16F3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 53% - Above average Total price: $468
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback