Performance Results


Gaming 8% Tree trunk	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 8% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	3.9% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.5% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

23 months ago, 23 months ago.

PC Performing below expectations (36^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3550S 766 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3550S CPU @ 3.00GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	73.5% Very good	Memory 86 1-Core 96.2 2-Core 185 71% 122 Pts	4-Core 355 8-Core 347 47% 351 Pts	64-Core 348 22% 348 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 73.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Gainward(10B0 0F00) 1GB CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 800 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	3.9% Terrible	Lighting 4.6 Reflection 7.4 Parallax 4.7 4% 5.57 fps	MRender 7 Gravity 5.1 Splatting 3.9 4% 5.33 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 3.9% Great: 5%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 172GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 352 285 303 299 299 305 MB/s Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)	76.5% Very good	Read 360 Write 346 Mixed 296 SusWrite 307 74% 327 MB/s	4K Read 29.8 4K Write 63.9 4K Mixed 38.2 128% 44 MB/s	DQ Read 40.7 DQ Write 113 DQ Mixed 56.9 49% 70.3 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 76.5% Great: 124%
Kingston SSDNow mS200 mSATA 60GB-$45 164 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 39GB free Firmware: 507ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 89 98 100 101 96 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43.6% Average	Read 157 Write 128 Mixed 141 SusWrite 97.3 29% 131 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 42 4K Mixed 25.9 93% 30.9 MB/s	DQ Read 32.5 DQ Write 85.8 DQ Mixed 33.1 33% 50.5 MB/s
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 76%
UFD 3.0 Silicon-Power16G 16GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 14GB free, PID 0902 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 21 21 21 21 21 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	9.27% Terrible	Read 32.5 Write 21 Mixed 17.8 SusWrite 20.9 29% 23.1 MB/s	4K Read 0 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0.1 3% 0.03 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 9.27% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR3 1600 4x4GB 473 User benchmarks, average bench 55% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing as expected (41^st percentile)	52.3% Above average	MC Read 17.9 MC Write 19.2 MC Mixed 16.5 51% 17.9 GB/s	SC Read 16 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 16.6 47% 16.4 GB/s	Latency 71.3 56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 52.3% Great: 64%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 24%

Surfboard

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 21%

Surfboard

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GBCorsairBench 53%, 34,385 samples	35x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	30x
99U5471-054.A00LF 2x8GBKingstonBench 53%, 9,823 samples	15x

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $384