Asus B85M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics3.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive43.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus B85M-E  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180404
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateJul 04 '22 at 00:14
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4440-$128
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
70.5% Very good
Memory 81.8
1-Core 91.2
2-Core 180
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 334
46% 339 Pts
64-Core 345
21% 345 Pts
Poor: 45%
This bench: 70.5%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 8572) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.47
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.57% Terrible
Lighting 4.3
Reflection 4.4
Parallax 4.5
4% 4.4 fps
MRender 4.4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 4.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.57%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Tecmiyo SATA SSD 120GB
49GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FW200619
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 47 34 32 12 17 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
43.1% Average
Read 441
Write 188
Mixed 30.4
SusWrite 39
38% 174 MB/s
4K Read 30.9
4K Write 11.7
4K Mixed 6.5
61% 16.4 MB/s
DQ Read 160
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 8.8
40% 92.3 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 75%
USB Flash Memory 2GB
1GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 4.8 4.9 4.7 4.9 4.8 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
3.67% Terrible
Read 11.9
Write 4.7
Mixed 4.2
SusWrite 4.8
8% 6.4 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
14% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.67%
Great: 7%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905402-570.A00LF 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 9905402-586.A00LF 0420 F3-12800CL9-4GBRL 14GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 2048, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
46.5% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 16.6
MC Mixed 14.7
45% 15.7 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 16.2
SC Mixed 16
43% 15.2 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 46.5%
Great: 62%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B85M-E Builds (Compare 2,957 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus B85M-E - $106

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $343
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback