Today's hottest deals

Asus P7H55

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive23.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus P7H55  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110103
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 06 '22 at 19:41
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU7%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (28th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
66.1% Good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 87.4
2-Core 145
64% 105 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 332
39% 302 Pts
64-Core 311
19% 311 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
32.6% Below average
Lighting 42.6
Reflection 41.1
Parallax 38.9
35% 40.9 fps
MRender 37.8
Gravity 41.9
Splatting 27.8
29% 35.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.6%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
69GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFKB1D1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 67 69 28 70 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.5% Poor
Read 152
Write 86.1
Mixed 84.3
SusWrite 58.9
21% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 18.9
4K Mixed 11.4
42% 14 MB/s
DQ Read 11.8
DQ Write 22.1
DQ Mixed 14.1
12% 16 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 23.5%
Great: 85%
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
33GB free
Firmware: SBFKB1E1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 128 133 133 135 133 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
24.7% Poor
Read 128
Write 84.4
Mixed 71.8
SusWrite 132
23% 104 MB/s
4K Read 10.4
4K Write 15.5
4K Mixed 9.3
36% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 9.2
DQ Write 14.9
DQ Mixed 11.3
9% 11.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 24.7%
Great: 85%
Samsung Spinpoint F4 2TB-$119
587GB free
Firmware: 1AQ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 71 67 72 69 29 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 48.7
Write 77.8
Mixed 46.5
SusWrite 63.4
44% 59.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
103% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
24.5% Poor
MC Read 8.1
MC Write 7.3
MC Mixed 6.3
21% 7.23 GB/s
SC Read 8.6
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 7.9
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 24.5%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7H55 Builds (Compare 321 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7H55

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback