Today's hottest deals

MSI B450M BAZOOKA MAX WIFI (MS-7C87)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive112% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C87
MotherboardMSI B450M BAZOOKA MAX WIFI (MS-7C87)  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200616
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 12 '22 at 04:57
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 14%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$88
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
78.5% Very good
Memory 64.7
1-Core 139
2-Core 276
84% 160 Pts
4-Core 494
8-Core 788
79% 641 Pts
64-Core 978
61% 978 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 78.5%
Great: 92%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 1TB-$98
188GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 455 471 474 473 427 419 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 491
Write 468
Mixed 362
SusWrite 453
100% 444 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 43.2
157% 58.8 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 356
DQ Mixed 298
243% 346 MB/s
Poor: 82%
This bench: 112%
Great: 137%
Kingston A400 120GB-$30
34GB free
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 92 29 88 78 17 MB/s
Performing below potential (39th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
56.8% Above average
Read 266
Write 114
Mixed 233
SusWrite 70
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 76
4K Mixed 20.6
105% 40.6 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 137
135% 209 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3600 C19 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
60.3% Good
MC Read 24
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 24
62% 21.8 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 15.6
SC Mixed 21.2
52% 18.2 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 60%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 125%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M BAZOOKA MAX WIFI (MS-7C87) Builds (Compare 1,461 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI B450M BAZOOKA MAX WIFI (MS-7C87)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $530
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback