Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results


Gaming 98% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 100% UFO	Workstation 107% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 99.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	96.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	92.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	20.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 11
BIOS Date	20210810
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jul 16 '22 at 07:41
Run Duration	345 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	28%

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260 60,132 User benchmarks, average bench 99% AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	99.8% Outstanding	Memory 75.3 1-Core 165 2-Core 296 96% 179 Pts	4-Core 665 8-Core 1,166 110% 915 Pts	64-Core 2026 125% 2026 Pts
Poor: 87% ↑ This bench: 99.8% Great: 108%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Zotac(19DA 2445) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	96.6% Outstanding	Lighting 121 Reflection 133 Parallax 123 99% 126 fps	MRender 95.2 Gravity 126 Splatting 114 92% 112 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 96.6% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 30GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 80 77 77 76 73 MB/s Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	92.9% Outstanding	Read 496 Write 450 Mixed 392 SusWrite 116 81% 364 MB/s	4K Read 42.4 4K Write 91.5 4K Mixed 54.4 182% 62.8 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 198 150% 201 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 92.9% Great: 124%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 2TB-$155 200,600 User benchmarks, average bench 336% 2TB free Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1805 1829 1818 1842 1539 1526 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	356% Outstanding	Read 2,531 Write 1,846 Mixed 1,764 SusWrite 1,726 441% 1,967 MB/s	4K Read 66 4K Write 162 4K Mixed 89.7 301% 106 MB/s	DQ Read 1,385 DQ Write 1,145 DQ Mixed 1,241 936% 1257 MB/s
Poor: 223% ↑ This bench: 356% Great: 435%
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$98 201,200 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 462GB free Firmware: RVQ01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 449 452 450 451 442 MB/s Performing above expectations (77^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 487 Write 448 Mixed 405 SusWrite 448 101% 447 MB/s	4K Read 33.3 4K Write 89.7 4K Mixed 46.2 157% 56.4 MB/s	DQ Read 221 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 200 151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 121%
WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 136 136 135 138 136 137 MB/s Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	58.3% Above average	Read 142 Write 128 Mixed 110 SusWrite 136 174% 129 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 123% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 61%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00MFCA0 1TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 46% 666GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 133 133 126 131 129 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	63.6% Good	Read 180 Write 165 Mixed 134 SusWrite 130 202% 152 MB/s	4K Read 1.5 4K Write 2.9 4K Mixed 0.9 135% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 63.6% Great: 64%
WDC WD20 EZRZ-00Z5HB0 2TB 101 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 337GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 0.4 0.2 0.1 0.2 0.3 1.7 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	22.4% Poor	Read 108 Write 112 Mixed 95.2 SusWrite 0.5 101% 78.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 0.9 105% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 22.4% Great: 61%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00BN5A0 1TB 37 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 514GB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 133 133 126 131 128 MB/s Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	61.3% Good	Read 169 Write 159 Mixed 133 SusWrite 130 198% 148 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 138% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 67%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB 92,468 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (20^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.6% Very good	MC Read 26.1 MC Write 25.4 MC Mixed 26.2 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 20.6 SC Write 15.5 SC Mixed 26.4 60% 20.8 GB/s	Latency 89.8 45% 89.8 ns
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 71.6% Great: 114%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 25,990 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $21

CPU
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $200Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	4,671x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $180Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	4,307x
Ryzen 5 5600XAMD $120Bench 96%, 383,420 samples	3,435x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,254x
RTX 3080Nvidia $899Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,086x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,474x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $91Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,846x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,108x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	869x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $44Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	775x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	730x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $115Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 86% - Excellent

Total price: $856

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $44	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16