Today's hottest deals

Asus P5G41T-M LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 45%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 48.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive17.7% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus P5G41T-M LX  (all builds)
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20100722
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJul 16 '22 at 08:15
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9400-$170
LGA775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
48.9% Average
Memory 75.6
1-Core 42.2
2-Core 84.4
44% 67.4 Pts
4-Core 124
8-Core 166
18% 145 Pts
64-Core 168
10% 168 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 48.9%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 420
Asus(1043 8450) 2GB
CLim: 700 MHz, MLim: 275 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.98% Terrible
Lighting 2.8
Reflection 3
Parallax 0.6
2% 2.13 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 0.2
Splatting 2
1% 1.7 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.98%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Afox 120GB 120GB
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 44 56 62 33 79 58 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
17.7% Very poor
Read 206
Write 196
Mixed 24.3
SusWrite 55.1
27% 120 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 4.4
20% 5.63 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 17.7%
Great: 90%
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB-$34
367GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 49 52 30 78 56 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 66.8
Write 101
Mixed 26.6
SusWrite 51.1
45% 61.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.5
70% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 61%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing below potential (22nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
21.9% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 6.5
MC Mixed 6.7
20% 6.93 GB/s
SC Read 5.9
SC Write 6.1
SC Mixed 6.3
17% 6.1 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 17%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P5G41T-M LX Builds (Compare 960 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P5G41T-M LX - $260

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 47% - Average Total price: $307
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback