Today's hottest deals

HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.73% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 18E4
Memory4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180504
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJan 18 '20 at 05:38
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4770-$75
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 109
2-Core 187
74% 127 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 568
57% 465 Pts
64-Core 571
35% 571 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Zotac(19DA 4294) 2GB
CLim: 1058 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
8.73% Terrible
Lighting 9.7
Reflection 9.23
Parallax 11
8% 9.99 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 11.8
Splatting 12.8
10% 12.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.73%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Afox 120GB 120GB
30GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 92 33 61 37 38 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
38.9% Below average
Read 424
Write 361
Mixed 25.2
SusWrite 73
48% 221 MB/s
4K Read 16
4K Write 10.9
4K Mixed 1.5
32% 9.47 MB/s
DQ Read 97.8
DQ Write 303
DQ Mixed 41.5
78% 147 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 90%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$30
837GB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 179 191 194 181 191 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
94.9% Outstanding
Read 144
Write 117
Mixed 80.3
SusWrite 188
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
142% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 94.9%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173QH0-CK0 M378B5173DB0-CK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
52.3% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.7
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 18.7
SC Mixed 15.8
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 31%
This bench: 52.3%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR Builds (Compare 3,822 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 800 G1 TWR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $228
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback