Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-E

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 40%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-E  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 17 '22 at 16:54
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 77.2
1-Core 100
2-Core 197
71% 125 Pts
4-Core 367
8-Core 621
60% 494 Pts
64-Core 1,012
63% 1,012 Pts
Poor: 64%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
Asus(1043 863E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (21st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53.2% Above average
Lighting 63.6
Reflection 74.1
Parallax 67.8
52% 68.5 fps
MRender 67.3
Gravity 70.9
Splatting 67.2
56% 68.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 53.2%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial BX100 250GB-$91
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MU02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 179 101 114 107 84 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
59.2% Above average
Read 444
Write 344
Mixed 58.2
SusWrite 134
54% 245 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 6.5
72% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 277
DQ Write 316
DQ Mixed 192
174% 262 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 59.2%
Great: 103%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$79
706GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 58 49 49 78 90 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
45.9% Average
Read 94.5
Write 92.7
Mixed 64
SusWrite 65.5
58% 79.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 45.9%
Great: 67%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$36
876GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 196 195 196 194 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 184
Write 188
Mixed 81.8
SusWrite 193
118% 162 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.9
161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 108%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3000 2OZ 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 2666 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
40% Average
MC Read 17.3
MC Write 11.5
MC Mixed 13.8
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 8
SC Mixed 11
27% 9.5 GB/s
Latency 85.9
46% 85.9 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 40%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-E Builds (Compare 442 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-E

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $125
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $330
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback