QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 99%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive11% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 24 '22 at 05:53
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1950X 16-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
72.4% Very good
Memory 70.5
1-Core 116
2-Core 205
73% 131 Pts
4-Core 399
8-Core 777
70% 588 Pts
64-Core 1,174
73% 1,174 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 72.4%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$365
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3535 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 157
Reflection 173
Parallax 172
128% 167 fps
MRender 214
Gravity 202
Splatting 157
152% 191 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 129%
Great: 174%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Red Hat VirtIO 320GB
269GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 95 100 99 101 99 MB/s
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
11% Very poor
Read 105
Write 95.8
Mixed 52.4
SusWrite 97.7
20% 87.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
3% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11%
Great: 11%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
125% Outstanding
MC Read 45.2
MC Write 45.3
MC Mixed 54.2
138% 48.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 25.4
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 100
40% 100 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 125%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $234Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback