QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 92.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics95.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 03 '20 at 09:32
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X 8-Core
CPU 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
92.8% Outstanding
Memory 79.7
1-Core 141
2-Core 286
91% 169 Pts
4-Core 567
8-Core 938
92% 752 Pts
64-Core 931
58% 931 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 92.8%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Gigabyte(1458 4011) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 432.0
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
95.8% Outstanding
Lighting 117
Reflection 114
Parallax 124
95% 118 fps
MRender 166
Gravity 111
Splatting 92
97% 123 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$126
510GB free
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1548 810 812 814 817 816 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
259% Outstanding
Read 1,575
Write 1,788
Mixed 1,412
SusWrite 936
321% 1,428 MB/s
4K Read 50
4K Write 176
4K Mixed 75.5
266% 100 MB/s
DQ Read 1,387
DQ Write 1,189
DQ Mixed 1,302
972% 1,293 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 259%
Great: 276%
Red Hat VirtIO 320GB
73GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 59 60 60 60 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
6.1% Terrible
Read 44
Write 40.7
Mixed 23
SusWrite 59.3
9% 41.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
2% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.1%
Great: 11%
Red Hat VirtIO 960GB
277GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 406 405 396 411 416 410 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
78.3% Very good
Read 455
Write 178
Mixed 340
SusWrite 407
77% 345 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 29.6
4K Mixed 25.4
83% 26 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 26.2
70% 149 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 78.3%
Great: 78%
Red Hat VirtIO 500GB
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 847 569 546 544 530 529 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 32% Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB DIMM RAM
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
90.6% Outstanding
MC Read 38.5
MC Write 23.3
MC Mixed 37.3
94% 33 GB/s
SC Read 23.7
SC Write 22
SC Mixed 33.1
75% 26.3 GB/s
Latency 81
49% 81 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 90.6%
Great: 161%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 612 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $350
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback