Today's hottest deals

Asus H110-PLUS

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (71st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 29 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H110-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190611
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 27 '22 at 02:52
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 45%
Watch Gameplay: 2070S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (71st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$179
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
78.7% Very good
Memory 91.9
1-Core 114
2-Core 212
80% 139 Pts
4-Core 354
8-Core 563
56% 458 Pts
64-Core 605
37% 605 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 78.7%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super)-$387
Nvidia(10DE 139E) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2235 MHz, MLim: 4013 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Lighting 168
Reflection 219
Parallax 176
137% 188 fps
MRender 210
Gravity 134
Splatting 121
123% 155 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 126%
Great: 123%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2010)-$68
545GB free
Firmware: 19.01H19
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 27 30 28 32 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
35% Below average
Read 92.9
Write 27.3
Mixed 38.8
SusWrite 29.1
35% 47 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.2
56% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 35%
Great: 74%
WD Blue 2.5" 160GB (2009)-$23
144GB free
Firmware: 11.01A11
SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 64 64 65 65 65 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Read 60.3
Write 64.1
Mixed 43.9
SusWrite 64.3
43% 58.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 2400 2OZ 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
84.8% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 32.8
MC Mixed 27
86% 30.2 GB/s
SC Read 17.6
SC Write 33.5
SC Mixed 24.5
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 64.2
62% 64.2 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 84.8%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110-PLUS Builds (Compare 1,846 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus H110-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $406
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback