Today's hottest deals

To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.33% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive59.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory2.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200629
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateAug 10 '22 at 19:44
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-3240
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 75.4
1-Core 90.2
2-Core 156
63% 107 Pts
4-Core 235
8-Core 219
31% 227 Pts
64-Core 236
15% 236 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 65%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Intel(8086 2010) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.33% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 1
Parallax 1.5
1% 1.33 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 1
Splatting 2
2% 1.87 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.33%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
JAJS600M256C 256GB
205GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VE0R5305
SusWrite @10s intervals: 223 230 231 230 227 228 MB/s
Performing below potential (30th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
59.7% Above average
Read 246
Write 222
Mixed 207
SusWrite 228
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 23
4K Write 43.8
4K Mixed 27.6
93% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 185
132% 165 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 59.7%
Great: 98%
Samsung HD321HJ 320GB
171GB free
Firmware: 1AC01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 113 113 112 111 111 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
63.6% Good
Read 110
Write 113
Mixed 60.2
SusWrite 112
72% 98.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 1.1
186% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 63.6%
Great: 64%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F6451U67F1600G 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
26.3% Poor
MC Read 9.1
MC Write 8.2
MC Mixed 7.7
24% 8.33 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 8.8
25% 8.8 GB/s
Latency 89.6
45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 15%
This bench: 26.3%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback