MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7B51
MotherboardMSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51)  (all builds)
Memory55.8 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211117
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '22 at 16:16
Run Duration353 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900K-$405
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
88.7% Excellent
Memory 81.4
1-Core 142
2-Core 268
90% 164 Pts
4-Core 514
8-Core 930
87% 722 Pts
64-Core 1,491
92% 1,491 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 88.7%
Great: 104%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB
333GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFM13.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 728 491 528 520 537 528 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,130
Write 2,146
Mixed 509
SusWrite 555
245% 1,085 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 45.6
170% 66.3 MB/s
DQ Read 923
DQ Write 530
DQ Mixed 667
513% 707 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 163%
Great: 262%
HFS128G3AMNB-2200A 128GB
119GB free
Firmware: 10105L00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 300 312 312 311 310 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85% Excellent
Read 480
Write 308
Mixed 293
SusWrite 309
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 22.3
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 27.3
108% 40.9 MB/s
DQ Read 354
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 223
193% 287 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85%
Great: 83%
Crucial M500 mSATA 240GB-$120
82GB free
Firmware: MU05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 268 267 267 268 267 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
84.3% Excellent
Read 428
Write 270
Mixed 299
SusWrite 267
71% 316 MB/s
4K Read 23.6
4K Write 84.4
4K Mixed 33.7
124% 47.2 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 182
164% 251 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 86%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB
137GB free
Firmware: ECFM13.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 905 341 341 340 338 338 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,502
Write 956
Mixed 1,244
SusWrite 434
231% 1,034 MB/s
4K Read 41.3
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 64.9
215% 79 MB/s
DQ Read 831
DQ Write 814
DQ Mixed 845
629% 830 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 190%
Great: 223%
Corsair Force MP500 NVMe PCIe M.2 240GB-$43
162GB free
Firmware: E7FM04.C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1021 1094 1077 1146 1136 1092 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
216% Outstanding
Read 1,126
Write 1305
Mixed 757
SusWrite 1,094
241% 1,071 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 56.3
195% 69.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,188
DQ Write 774
DQ Mixed 595
548% 852 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 216%
Great: 210%
TOSHIBA HDWN160 6TB
2.5TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 188 187 184 184 186 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
79.7% Very good
Read 195
Write 160
Mixed 80.4
SusWrite 183
202% 155 MB/s
4K Read 19.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
187% 7.53 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 79.7%
Great: 80%
TOSHIBA HDWD130 3TB
1TB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 70 187 184 184 186 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
65.4% Good
Read 177
Write 188
Mixed 31.9
SusWrite 155
180% 138 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.8
92% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 72%
ST2000DM 001-1ER164 2TB
820GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 96 0.3 0.7 0.3 18 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
39.7% Below average
Read 192
Write 154
Mixed 90.3
SusWrite 30.7
142% 117 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 39.7%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL16G32C16U4B.16FE 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile)
69.4% Good
MC Read 23.2
MC Write 28.2
MC Mixed 22.8
71% 24.7 GB/s
SC Read 14
SC Write 29.2
SC Mixed 18.4
59% 20.5 GB/s
Latency 77.9
51% 77.9 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 160%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) Builds (Compare 23,158 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: MSI MPG Z390 GAMING PLUS (MS-7B51) - $175

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $835
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $79
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $363
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback