Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME A320M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics29% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive170% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus PRIME A320M-K  (all builds)
Memory6.9 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0 Days
Run DateAug 23 '22 at 20:22
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600-$110
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
72% Very good
Memory 68.5
1-Core 106
2-Core 212
71% 129 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 564
62% 487 Pts
64-Core 706
44% 706 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72%
Great: 78%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.95
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29% Poor
Lighting 37.4
Reflection 44.5
Parallax 39.9
30% 40.6 fps
MRender 34
Gravity 38.3
Splatting 26.2
26% 32.8 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Z4-1TB 1TB
348GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0417A3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1215 1061 415 179 236 238 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
170% Outstanding
Read 1,498
Write 1,083
Mixed 931
SusWrite 557
227% 1,017 MB/s
4K Read 45.1
4K Write 122
4K Mixed 24.2
164% 63.9 MB/s
DQ Read 660
DQ Write 646
DQ Mixed 522
428% 609 MB/s
Poor: 122%
This bench: 170%
Great: 170%
WD Purple 4TB (2014)-$73
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 168 175 174 173 176 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 165
Mixed 76.5
SusWrite 172
108% 147 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.1
216% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 100%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown SED2400U1704 Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-2133 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
66.9% Good
MC Read 26.9
MC Write 24.6
MC Mixed 23.2
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 14.1
SC Mixed 20.9
48% 16.7 GB/s
Latency 105
38% 105 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME A320M-K Builds (Compare 12,619 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus PRIME A320M-K - $72

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $316
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback