Today's hottest deals

HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (17th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 83 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive143% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (33%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8767
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210729
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateAug 26 '22 at 15:04
Run Duration266 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU 33%
Watch Gameplay: 1660S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$94
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
81.9% Excellent
Memory 86.6
1-Core 113
2-Core 222
80% 140 Pts
4-Core 416
8-Core 690
67% 553 Pts
64-Core 828
51% 828 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 81.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$219
HP(103C 8789) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.93
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.5% Above average
Lighting 66.1
Reflection 84.1
Parallax 74
54% 74.7 fps
MRender 101
Gravity 51.7
Splatting 66.8
59% 73 fps
Poor: 65%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 76%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40znv512g KIOXIA 512GB
148GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP00AE00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 778 625 404 283 351 349 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
143% Outstanding
Read 822
Write 1,130
Mixed 930
SusWrite 465
189% 837 MB/s
4K Read 36.4
4K Write 80.8
4K Mixed 47.6
159% 54.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,069
DQ Write 367
DQ Mixed 674
509% 703 MB/s
Poor: 107%
This bench: 143%
Great: 213%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
305GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 324 308 359 370 370 362 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 349
Write 333
Mixed 323
SusWrite 349
76% 338 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 26.7
4K Mixed 21.2
65% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 77.5
DQ Write 109
DQ Mixed 96.2
72% 94.2 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 99%
Seagate Expansion SW 5TB
4TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 38 39 39 39 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Read 35.3
Write 37.7
Mixed 33.5
SusWrite 38.9
27% 36.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.6
169% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 67%
USB DISK 2.0 16GB
11GB free, PID 0021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 14.7
Mixed 8.5
12% 11.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.1
4K Mixed 0
17% 1.55 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA82GU6DJR8N-VK 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
41.3% Average
MC Read 15
MC Write 14.7
MC Mixed 12.1
40% 13.9 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 11.6
SC Mixed 13.3
34% 12 GB/s
Latency 70.8
56% 70.8 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx Builds (Compare 5,816 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

System: HP Pavilion Gaming Desktop TG01-1xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $389
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback