HP EliteBook 8760w

Performance Results


Gaming 21% Surfboard	Desktop 70% Battleship	Workstation 17% Surfboard


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	43% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

20 months ago, 20 months ago.

System	HP EliteBook 8760w (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 1630
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110726
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Sep 03 '22 at 02:51
Run Duration	207 Seconds
Run User	VNM-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-2820QM-$230 4,929 User benchmarks, average bench 59% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (60^th percentile)	62.6% Good	Memory 80.1 1-Core 84.7 2-Core 145 62% 103 Pts	4-Core 250 8-Core 323 37% 287 Pts	64-Core 330 20% 330 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 62.6% Great: 70%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 965M 3 User benchmarks, average bench 27% HP(103C 1630) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1050 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.77 Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	27% Poor	Lighting 30.7 Reflection 37 Parallax 32.3 25% 33.3 fps	MRender 44 Gravity 30.8 Splatting 38.3 31% 37.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 27%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow V+200 Series 120GB 853 User benchmarks, average bench 72% 54GB free (System drive) Firmware: 501ABBF0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 88 89 90 87 91 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	43% Average	Read 149 Write 123 Mixed 131 SusWrite 89.8 28% 123 MB/s	4K Read 18.4 4K Write 50.5 4K Mixed 22.9 84% 30.6 MB/s	DQ Read 140 DQ Write 117 DQ Mixed 106 85% 121 MB/s
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 43% Great: 83%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB 452,134 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 322GB free Firmware: SDM2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 96 101 101 97 101 MB/s Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)	41.4% Average	Read 48.3 Write 97 Mixed 50.9 SusWrite 95.1 54% 72.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 0.6 157% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 41.4% Great: 71%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB SODIMM DDR3 Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	46.9% Average	MC Read 16.5 MC Write 16.3 MC Mixed 15.2 46% 16 GB/s	SC Read 14.3 SC Write 14.8 SC Mixed 16 43% 15 GB/s	Latency 80.4 50% 80.4 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 46.9% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical EliteBook 8760w Builds (Compare 362 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 57%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: HP EliteBook 8760w

CPU
Core i7-2820QMIntel $230Bench 59%, 4,929 samples	68x
Core i7-2630QMIntel $199Bench 55%, 39,605 samples	55x
Core i7-2670QMIntel $200Bench 56%, 51,169 samples	55x

GPU
Quadro 3000MNvidiaBench 6%, 2,560 samples	236x
Quadro 4000MNvidiaBench 8%, 1,114 samples	37x
FirePro M5950 AMDBench 5%, 1,394 samples	36x

SSD
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	17x
PM830 256GBSamsungBench 66%, 2,468 samples	12x
C400 RealSSD 256GBMicronBench 55%, 11,652 samples	10x

RAM
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	85x
4x4GBUnknownBench 43%, 106,178 samples	62x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	47x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 57% - Above average

Total price: $283

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16