Today's hottest deals

HP Z400 Workstation

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics1.18% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive15.3% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemHP Z400 Workstation  (all builds)
MotherboardHewlett-Packard 0B4Ch
Memory5 GB free of 8.00195 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20130715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateSep 04 '22 at 07:42
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User VNM-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon W3565
CPU0 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
73.7% Very good
Memory 90.9
1-Core 79.5
2-Core 163
67% 111 Pts
4-Core 328
8-Core 328
44% 328 Pts
64-Core 327
20% 327 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620
Asus(1043 83EA) 2GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 391.35
Relative performance (0th percentile)
1.18% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 3.3
Parallax 0.7
1% 1.83 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 0.2
1% 1.53 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.18%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biostar S130-90GB 90GB
12GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BS 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 46 15 7.1 29 6.9 19 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
15.3% Very poor
Read 73
Write 82.5
Mixed 63.3
SusWrite 20.7
13% 59.9 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 7.9
35% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 10.1
DQ Write 18.6
DQ Mixed 12.6
10% 13.8 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 62%
WD WD3200AVVS-63L2B0 320GB
67GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 16 9.9 30 7.6 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 52.5
Write 50.3
Mixed 38
SusWrite 21.7
30% 40.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
124% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5173EB0-CK0 ID:80 CE M378B5173EB0-CK0 42GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 34816 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
32.8% Below average
MC Read 12.3
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 9.5
31% 10.8 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8.1
SC Mixed 8.4
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 65.9
61% 65.9 ns
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.8%
Great: 33%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z400 Workstation Builds (Compare 3,453 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: HP Z400 Workstation

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $255
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $130
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $389
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback