Today's hottest deals

Asus M2NPV-VM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 11%
Tree trunk
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.74% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus M2NPV-VM  (all builds)
Memory0.4 GB free of 2 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070508
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 16 '22 at 10:34
Run Duration204 Seconds
Run User UKR-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon 64 X2 Dual Core 4200+
Socket AM2 , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Memory 35.9
1-Core 25.1
2-Core 50.4
23% 37.1 Pts
4-Core 55.7
8-Core 57.8
8% 56.8 Pts
64-Core 62.3
4% 62.3 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8500 GT
Asus(1043 8264) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.01
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
0.74% Terrible
Lighting 0.7
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 0
1% 1.07 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 0.6
Splatting 1.2
1% 1.33 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 0.74%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
418GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 67 62 21 12 5.8 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
40.3% Average
Read 107
Write 105
Mixed 51.5
SusWrite 33.3
54% 74.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
119% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 40.3%
Great: 109%
USB FLASH DRIVE 16GB
14GB free, PID b113
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 15
10% 15 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Mixed 0
10% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x1GB
2 of 4 slots used
2GB DIMM
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
MC Read 4.1
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 3.6
12% 4.13 GB/s
SC Read 3.3
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 0
7% 2.37 GB/s
Latency 222
18% 222 ns
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 20%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M2NPV-VM Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M2NPV-VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 45% - Average Total price: $155
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback