Today's hottest deals

HP 260-a129

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 33.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP 260-a129  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 81B3
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170531
Uptime5.9 Days
Run DateOct 01 '22 at 15:08
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A8-7410 APU (2015 M.Ca)
P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
33.4% Below average
Memory 47.7
1-Core 32.4
2-Core 61.7
30% 47.3 Pts
4-Core 114
8-Core 107
15% 110 Pts
64-Core 103
6% 103 Pts
Poor: 16%
This bench: 33.4%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5
HP(103C 81B3) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 20.10.35.02
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
1.46% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 2
1% 2.3 fps
MRender 2.5
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 3.5
2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.46%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 250GB-$40
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR010
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 372
Write 275
Mixed 269
68% 305 MB/s
4K Read 19.8
4K Write 38.1
4K Mixed 23.6
80% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 197
DQ Write 163
DQ Mixed 163
127% 174 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 123%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
748GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 85.2
Write 95.5
Mixed 65
61% 81.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
191% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Seagate BUP Slim RD 2TB
392GB free
Firmware: 0107
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 74.9
Write 68.8
Mixed 45.8
47% 63.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 1
206% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73EB0-YK0 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
17.1% Very poor
MC Read 7.3
MC Write 4.3
MC Mixed 5.8
17% 5.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.7
SC Write 3.8
SC Mixed 5.9
14% 4.8 GB/s
Latency 169
24% 169 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 17.1%
Great: 34%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 260-a129 Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: HP 260-a129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback