Asrock X99X Killer

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics30.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock X99X Killer  (all builds)
Memory41.2 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180406
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 13 '22 at 21:12
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (20th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1620 v3
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
66.8% Good
Memory 75.4
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 188
68% 120 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 430
48% 374 Pts
64-Core 444
28% 444 Pts
Poor: 60%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 680-$360
EVGA(3842 2682) 2GB
CLim: 1293 MHz, MLim: 1552 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 473.81
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
30.1% Below average
Lighting 34
Reflection 34.2
Parallax 46.5
28% 38.2 fps
MRender 46.7
Gravity 44.9
Splatting 37.8
35% 43.1 fps
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 35%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 121 103 142 147 141 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
Read 151
Write 156
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 134
88% 122 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
133% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
0GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 80.4
Write 86.2
Mixed 53
54% 73.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
193% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
746GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 131 126 125 127 130 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 119
Write 110
Mixed 28
SusWrite 128
69% 96.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.6
141% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 108%
Seagate ST3000NM0053 3TB
746GB free
Firmware: G00A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 115 117 114 120 122 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
62.3% Good
Read 98.8
Write 122
Mixed 78.8
SusWrite 118
77% 104 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
198% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 62.3%
Great: 101%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
746GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 130 127 124 127 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
66.8% Good
Read 106
Write 119
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 127
69% 95.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.5
126% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 66.8%
Great: 108%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$100
746GB free
Firmware: MX6OACF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 126 122 127 129 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)
70.7% Very good
Read 120
Write 126
Mixed 34
SusWrite 126
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.6
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.7%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 2400 C14 6x8GB
6 of 8 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
74.9% Very good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 30.4
MC Mixed 27.3
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.2
SC Write 18.5
SC Mixed 18.9
47% 16.5 GB/s
Latency 89.6
45% 89.6 ns
Poor: 75%
This bench: 74.9%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X99X Killer Builds (Compare 267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 75%
Battleship

Motherboard: Asrock X99X Killer - $350

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $768
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback