Performance Results


Gaming 67% Battle cruiser	Desktop 84% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 61% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	84.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	189% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	40.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200814
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Oct 23 '22 at 10:22
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	47%

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$83 1,072,639 User benchmarks, average bench 83% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.95 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	74.8% Very good	Memory 74.8 1-Core 115 2-Core 240 78% 143 Pts	4-Core 402 8-Core 653 65% 527 Pts	64-Core 823 51% 823 Pts
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$279 447,556 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Gigabyte(1458 4074) CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 522.25 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	84.7% Excellent	Lighting 111 Reflection 101 Parallax 99.5 91% 104 fps	MRender 113 Gravity 88 Splatting 73.2 73% 91.4 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 106%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 242GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 790 652 641 636 634 612 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	189% Outstanding	Read 1,626 Write 1,297 Mixed 984 SusWrite 661 255% 1,142 MB/s	4K Read 34.8 4K Write 86.8 4K Mixed 49.7 162% 57.1 MB/s	DQ Read 883 DQ Write 580 DQ Mixed 719 540% 728 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 189% Great: 340%
Kingston A400 120GB-$30 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 110GB free Firmware: SBFK71E0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 52 46 54 54 55 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	52.4% Above average	Read 338 Write 187 Mixed 229 SusWrite 81.6 46% 209 MB/s	4K Read 18.7 4K Write 62.1 4K Mixed 20 87% 33.6 MB/s	DQ Read 162 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 121 106% 156 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 52.4% Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80 112,118 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 2TB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 129 138 126 131 138 150 MB/s Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	81.4% Excellent	Read 149 Write 142 Mixed 67.5 SusWrite 135 90% 123 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 105% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 81.4% Great: 114%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3200C16 CMW32GX4M2E3200C16 CMK16GX4M2D3200C16 48GB 6 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz 16384, 8192, 16384, 8192 MB Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	MC Read 27.9 MC Write 21.2 MC Mixed 28.6 74% 25.9 GB/s	SC Read 13.6 SC Write 19.8 SC Mixed 22.3 53% 18.6 GB/s	Latency 90.7 44% 90.7 ns
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 92%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 129%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 130%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	2,236x
RTX 3080Nvidia $625Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	2,073x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	1,468x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	1,835x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $102Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	1,106x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	866x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	770x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	724x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $114Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	646x

Value: 97% - Outstanding

Total price: $937

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16