Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z97N-WIFI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics6.43% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive87.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z97N-WIFI  (all builds)
Memory9.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151210
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 27 '22 at 18:09
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User HND-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5675C-$289
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
68.4% Good
Memory 79.2
1-Core 107
2-Core 195
73% 127 Pts
4-Core 327
8-Core 371
46% 349 Pts
64-Core 375
23% 375 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Pro HD 6200 (Desktop)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Relative performance (0th percentile)
6.43% Terrible
Lighting 7.5
Reflection 7.4
Parallax 8.1
6% 7.67 fps
MRender 10.3
Gravity 8.2
Splatting 7.8
7% 8.77 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 6.43%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S3700100
SusWrite @10s intervals: 325 321 361 428 438 382 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 435
Write 376
Mixed 376
SusWrite 376
88% 391 MB/s
4K Read 29.1
4K Write 70.4
4K Mixed 27.2
116% 42.2 MB/s
DQ Read 221
DQ Write 336
DQ Mixed 125
138% 227 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-160.A00LF 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
63.3% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 20.6
MC Mixed 26.8
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 6.3
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 10.7
30% 10.6 GB/s
Latency 82.1
49% 82.1 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 63.3%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z97N-WIFI Builds (Compare 391 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z97N-WIFI - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $778
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback