bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory352GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 352GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory240.6 GB free of 352 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20181207
Uptime16.1 Days
Run DateNov 10 '22 at 06:14
Run Duration231 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 41%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon Platinum 8249C
None, 1 CPU, 25 cores, 50 threads
Base clock 2.1 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.4% Above average
Memory 52.4
1-Core 43.5
2-Core 140
43% 78.6 Pts
4-Core 281
8-Core 566
50% 424 Pts
64-Core 1811
112% 1811 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 52%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Virtual HD 564GB
444GB free
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 151 145 146 146 144 138 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.1% Average
Read 298
Write 313
Mixed 344
SusWrite 145
62% 275 MB/s
4K Read 9
4K Write 16.7
4K Mixed 13
39% 12.9 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 168
DQ Mixed 132
112% 163 MB/s
Microsoft NVMe Direct Disk 960GB
886GB free
Firmware: NVMDV001 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1589 1974 1572 1678 1496 2006 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
281% Outstanding
Read 3,091
Write 2,022
Mixed 1,021
SusWrite 1,719
436% 1,963 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 46
4K Mixed 29.5
86% 30.4 MB/s
DQ Read 558
DQ Write 566
DQ Mixed 534
409% 553 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 281%
Great: 281%
Virtual HD 137GB
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.8 2.9 6.3 8 8.1 7.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
16.7% Very poor
Read 51.9
Write 7
Mixed 9.2
SusWrite 6.2
14% 18.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.2
53% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 83%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 14TB
13TB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 141 183 197 183 164 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
100% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 222
Mixed 116
SusWrite 161
126% 172 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 2
338% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 100%
This bench: 100%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 352GB
null MHz
1024, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 32767, 31754 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
107% Outstanding
MC Read 47
MC Write 45.7
MC Mixed 44.6
131% 45.8 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 5.6
15% 5.23 GB/s
Latency 152
26% 152 ns
Poor: 88%
This bench: 107%
Great: 156%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback