bin bin

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Boot Drive57.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory220GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 220GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Virtual machine detected, hardware performance reduced. Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardMicrosoft Virtual Machine
Memory209.5 GB free of 219.951 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 2736 x 1824 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220509
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 25 '23 at 09:42
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD EPYC 7V13 64-Core
None, 1 CPU, 24 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 2.45 GHz, turbo 2.45 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
73.9% Very good
Memory 62.4
1-Core 112
2-Core 228
72% 134 Pts
4-Core 456
8-Core 912
81% 684 Pts
64-Core 2,495
154% 2,495 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 73.9%
Great: 77%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Microsoft Virtual Disk 550GB
478GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 146 147 155 161 167 MB/s
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
57.1% Above average
Read 212
Write 164
Mixed 145
SusWrite 152
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 72.3
4K Write 10.5
4K Mixed 14.4
134% 32.4 MB/s
DQ Read 69.9
DQ Write 13.9
DQ Mixed 23.6
22% 35.8 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 57.1%
Great: 81%
Microsoft Virtual Disk 69GB
56GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 83 82 82 84 86 MB/s
Performing below potential (61st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.3% Above average
Read 212
Write 224
Mixed 242
SusWrite 82.9
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 25.3
4K Write 55.5
4K Mixed 38.7
117% 39.8 MB/s
DQ Read 108
DQ Write 48.6
DQ Mixed 111
74% 89.4 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 54.3%
Great: 72%
Microsoft NVMe Direct Disk 960GB
894GB free
Firmware: NVMDV001 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1091 1113 1196 1200 1192 1169 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
138% Outstanding
Read 910
Write 1306
Mixed 722
SusWrite 1160
232% 1,024 MB/s
4K Read 18
4K Write 23.8
4K Mixed 20.4
66% 20.7 MB/s
DQ Read 56.5
DQ Write 408
DQ Mixed 219
173% 228 MB/s
Poor: 138%
This bench: 138%
Great: 281%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Microsoft Corporation None Corporation None Corporation None Corporation None 122GB
0, 0, 0, 0 MHz
59392, 948, 32767, 32767 MB
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
178% Outstanding
MC Read 79.2
MC Write 60.2
MC Mixed 73.6
203% 71 GB/s
SC Read 20.6
SC Write 42
SC Mixed 35.6
94% 32.7 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 105%
This bench: 178%
Great: 364%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 32 0" 1280 720
Typical bin Builds (Compare 24,558 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Disqualified System: bin bin

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $353
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback