Today's hottest deals

Asus P8Z68-V

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 61.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics32.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (94%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
24 months ago, 24 months ago.
MotherboardAsus P8Z68-V  (all builds)
Memory20.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kleuren,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121109
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateNov 16 '22 at 22:09
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 94%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
61.4% Good
Memory 75.9
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 167
63% 109 Pts
4-Core 272
8-Core 274
36% 273 Pts
64-Core 302
19% 302 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
32.1% Below average
Lighting 42
Reflection 41
Parallax 38.7
34% 40.6 fps
MRender 36.2
Gravity 41.8
Splatting 27.6
28% 35.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
105GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 209 143 136 140 145 145 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
55.2% Above average
Read 334
Write 331
Mixed 180
SusWrite 153
56% 250 MB/s
4K Read 15.4
4K Write 31.1
4K Mixed 19.7
65% 22.1 MB/s
DQ Read 314
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 176
159% 243 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 55.2%
Great: 124%
Samsung 750 EVO 250GB-$150
61GB free
Firmware: MAT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 211 198 193 185 204 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.5% Above average
Read 229
Write 220
Mixed 182
SusWrite 196
46% 207 MB/s
4K Read 19.5
4K Write 32.5
4K Mixed 22.8
76% 24.9 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 190
DQ Mixed 195
147% 196 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 53.5%
Great: 114%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$110
322GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 240 284 289 308 321 307 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
70.8% Very good
Read 328
Write 297
Mixed 288
SusWrite 291
68% 301 MB/s
4K Read 13.8
4K Write 18.2
4K Mixed 31.4
71% 21.1 MB/s
DQ Read 394
DQ Write 343
DQ Mixed 488
333% 408 MB/s
Poor: 210%
This bench: 70.8%
Great: 429%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron CT102464BD160B.C16 04CD F3-1600C9-8GXM CT102464BD160B.C16 04CD F3-1600C9-8GXM 32GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
44.8% Average
MC Read 15.3
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.3
46% 16 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 8.7
32% 11.3 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P8Z68-V Builds (Compare 855 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P8Z68-V - $390

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $795
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback