Today's hottest deals

MSI Z68A-G45 (B3) (MS-7750)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics36.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7750
MotherboardMSI Z68A-G45 (B3) (MS-7750)  (all builds)
Memory3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120110
Uptime10.3 Days
Run DateNov 05 '17 at 00:45
Run Duration1339 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
77.4% Very good
Memory 84.3
1-Core 110
2-Core 217
78% 137 Pts
4-Core 409
8-Core 398
54% 404 Pts
64-Core 387
24% 387 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
CLim: 991 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.7.1
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Lighting 47.7
Reflection 32.2
Parallax 61
39% 47 fps
MRender 30.7
Gravity 47.1
Splatting 39.9
32% 39.2 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$99
55GB free
Firmware: EXT0CB6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
54.1% Above average
Read 240
Write 166
Mixed 159
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 37.4
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 20.3
109% 35.7 MB/s
DQ Read 42.2
DQ Write 63.3
DQ Mixed 20.2
24% 41.9 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 54.1%
Great: 118%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 433
Write 356
Mixed 313
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 39.3
4K Write 69.7
4K Mixed 25
128% 44.7 MB/s
DQ Read 45
DQ Write 95.1
DQ Mixed 24.7
32% 54.9 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 124%
Adata S599 64GB
18GB free
Firmware: 3.1.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
22.7% Poor
Read 149
Write 63.9
Mixed 89.7
22% 101 MB/s
4K Read 17.9
4K Write 10
4K Mixed 7.16
42% 11.7 MB/s
DQ Read 23.2
DQ Write 10.2
DQ Mixed 6.94
8% 13.5 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 50%
Adata S511 60GB
3GB free
Firmware: 319ABBF0 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
40.7% Average
Read 214
Write 74.6
Mixed 96.1
28% 128 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 57.1
4K Mixed 11.5
89% 32.6 MB/s
DQ Read 28.7
DQ Write 64.5
DQ Mixed 12.8
19% 35.3 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 40.7%
Great: 66%
Seagate STM3500418AS 500GB
25GB free
Firmware: CC38 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
38% Below average
Read 65.1
Write 67
Mixed 31.6
40% 54.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.46
4K Write 1.34
4K Mixed 0.38
87% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 38%
Great: 71%
WD Blue 320GB (2007)-$26
14GB free
Firmware: 01.03A01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
36% Below average
Read 62.6
Write 62.4
Mixed 41.7
41% 55.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.65
4K Write 1.97
4K Mixed 0.43
111% 1.02 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36%
Great: 58%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 CMX8GX3M2A1333C9 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
48.1% Average
MC Read 16.6
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 15.7
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 14
40% 14.1 GB/s
Latency 72.9
55% 72.9 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 48.1%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z68A-G45 (B3) (MS-7750) Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 18%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI Z68A-G45 (B3) (MS-7750)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $327
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $215Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback