Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-Z68AP-D3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 33%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics1.51% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive38.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z68AP-D3  (all builds)
Memory3.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120320
Uptime57.8 Days
Run DateNov 19 '22 at 04:14
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User NZL-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
Socket 1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
33% Below average
Memory 50.6
1-Core 81
2-Core 66.3
43% 66 Pts
4-Core 83.9
8-Core 205
16% 144 Pts
64-Core 252
16% 252 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 33%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Desktop V1 1.1 GHz)
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
1.51% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.3
Parallax 1.5
2% 1.53 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 1.1
Splatting 2.3
2% 1.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 1.51%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
32GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 127 91 76 70 70 67 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.9% Below average
Read 208
Write 181
Mixed 195
SusWrite 83.3
37% 167 MB/s
4K Read 15.7
4K Write 35.8
4K Mixed 22.7
72% 24.7 MB/s
DQ Read 40
DQ Write 90.1
DQ Mixed 50.9
43% 60.3 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 124%
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
180GB free
Firmware: SBFK10D7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 111 74 62 61 59 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
27.5% Poor
Read 130
Write 109
Mixed 105
SusWrite 78.5
24% 106 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 29
4K Mixed 16.6
48% 17.7 MB/s
DQ Read 31.4
DQ Write 64.8
DQ Mixed 35.6
31% 43.9 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 100%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$34
717GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 110 73 62 60 60 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
54.4% Above average
Read 111
Write 150
Mixed 72
SusWrite 78.1
76% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
202% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 54.4%
Great: 109%
Seagate Expansion 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 133 128 132 130 132 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
47.2% Average
Read 92.9
Write 132
Mixed 36.6
SusWrite 129
135% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.1
66% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 47.2%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15.2% Very poor
MC Read 4.5
MC Write 4.9
MC Mixed 5.2
14% 4.87 GB/s
SC Read 4.4
SC Write 5.3
SC Mixed 4.9
14% 4.87 GB/s
Latency 158
25% 158 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 15.2%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z68AP-D3 Builds (Compare 1,408 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z68AP-D3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $471
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $370
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback