To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory7.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190328
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '22 at 01:13
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU 18%
Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3930K-$280
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
73.4% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 79.7
2-Core 188
68% 117 Pts
4-Core 336
8-Core 536
54% 436 Pts
64-Core 640
40% 640 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130
Asus(1043 0525) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1180 MHz, MLim: 1950 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.11.1
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.7% Average
Lighting 56.4
Reflection 60
Parallax 79.4
46% 65.3 fps
MRender 62.4
Gravity 67.1
Splatting 41.7
45% 57.1 fps
Poor: 46%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mushkin MKNSSDHL250GB-D8 250GB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1115F0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,300
Write 815
Mixed 942
226% 1,019 MB/s
4K Read 28.6
4K Write 86.8
4K Mixed 33.2
132% 49.5 MB/s
DQ Read 604
DQ Write 471
DQ Mixed 528
397% 534 MB/s
Poor: 89% Great: 199%
MLD M700 NVMe SSD 1TB
542GB free
Firmware: EIFM21.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 624
Write 651
Mixed 654
144% 643 MB/s
4K Read 29.4
4K Write 81.1
4K Mixed 45.1
145% 51.9 MB/s
DQ Read 648
DQ Write 437
DQ Mixed 563
414% 549 MB/s
Poor: 254% Great: 461%
Kingston SNV2S500G 500GB
452GB free
Firmware: SBI02102
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 170
Write 148
Mixed 161
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 24
4K Write 31.2
4K Mixed 22.4
82% 25.9 MB/s
DQ Read 190
DQ Write 157
DQ Mixed 161
124% 169 MB/s
Poor: 127% Great: 323%
SanDisk Ultra Flair USB 3.0 128GB-$12
112GB free, PID 5591
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 50.2
Write 6.2
Mixed 0.5
15% 19 MB/s
4K Mixed 0
0% 0 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 41%
Generic Flash Disk 16GB
11GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 23.7
Write 5.5
Mixed 10
14% 13.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.8
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
18% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 2% Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5403-046.A 99U5403-065.A 12GB
1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
64.8% Good
MC Read 25.6
MC Write 23.7
MC Mixed 23.6
69% 24.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.6
SC Write 13
SC Mixed 10.8
36% 12.5 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 64.8%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,654 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $154Nvidia RTX 4060 $250WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $388WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $520Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback