Today's hottest deals

Asrock X299M Extreme4

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics93.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X299M Extreme4  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20191128
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 05 '22 at 13:33
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User JPN-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9940X-$790
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
85.4% Excellent
Memory 77.8
1-Core 124
2-Core 236
81% 146 Pts
4-Core 497
8-Core 992
88% 744 Pts
64-Core 2,160
134% 2,160 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 85.4%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 517.40
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
93.1% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 109
Parallax 113
96% 113 fps
MRender 135
Gravity 103
Splatting 92.1
88% 110 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.1%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$50
158GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,456
Write 2,063
Mixed 1,534
448% 2,018 MB/s
4K Read 59.6
4K Write 148
4K Mixed 80.9
272% 96 MB/s
DQ Read 972
DQ Write 772
DQ Mixed 849
642% 864 MB/s
Poor: 152% Great: 302%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$71
138GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,612
Write 1945
Mixed 1683
392% 1,747 MB/s
4K Read 55.7
4K Write 125
4K Mixed 75.7
248% 85.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,007
DQ Write 750
DQ Mixed 880
657% 879 MB/s
Poor: 144% Great: 295%
BUFFALO USB Flash Disk 16GB
14GB free, PID 023a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 39.2
Write 2.7
Mixed 15.7
18% 19.2 MB/s
4K Read 6.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
23% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF2666C16D4/8G 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
103% Outstanding
MC Read 37.2
MC Write 53.5
MC Mixed 33
118% 41.2 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 21.7
SC Mixed 9.7
37% 12.9 GB/s
Latency 84.6
47% 84.6 ns
Poor: 73%
This bench: 103%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X299M Extreme4 Builds (Compare 53 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 86%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 87%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock X299M Extreme4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $985
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $146
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $379WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $219Nvidia RTX 4070 $278Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback