Performance Results

Gaming 18%
Desktop 77%
Workstation 17%
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics11.4% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive114% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
20 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C02
MotherboardMSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02)  (all builds)
Memory9.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200609
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 15 '22 at 22:11
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (84th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 3 2200G-$104
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.75 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Memory 78.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 229
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 396
50% 379 Pts
64-Core 396
24% 396 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX Vega 8 (Ryzen iGPU)
MSI(1462 7C02) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 22.11.2
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Lighting 14.1
Reflection 14.6
Parallax 19.6
12% 16.1 fps
MRender 13.2
Gravity 16
Splatting 12.6
11% 13.9 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 11%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
410GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 469 442 471 432 296 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 483
Mixed 456
SusWrite 427
105% 465 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 86.7
4K Mixed 50.4
166% 57.9 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 368
277% 371 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 114%
Great: 129%
2TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 180 181 182 181 179 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
21.4% Poor
Read 192
Write 174
Mixed 94.2
SusWrite 181
36% 160 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 0.7
9% 3.97 MB/s
DQ Read 0.8
DQ Write 10.5
DQ Mixed 1.1
2% 4.13 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.4%
Great: 23%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BL8G32C16U4WL.M8FE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
105% Outstanding
MC Read 39.9
MC Write 39.9
MC Mixed 35.1
109% 38.3 GB/s
SC Read 25
SC Write 40.9
SC Mixed 28.7
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 83.9
48% 83.9 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 105%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) Builds (Compare 19,539 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI B450 TOMAHAWK MAX (MS-7C02) - $130

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $542
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
Intel Core i5-12600K $165Nvidia RTX 4060 $259WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $119
Intel Core i5-13600K $248Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $390WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $90
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4070 $325Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $418
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback