Today's hottest deals

Asrock B450M Pro4-F R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 62%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive44.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (54%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock B450M Pro4-F R2.0  (all builds)
Memory11.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20221026
Uptime0 Days
Run DateDec 16 '22 at 23:40
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU 54%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$115
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
62% Good
Memory 58.2
1-Core 130
2-Core 195
71% 128 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 585
57% 469 Pts
64-Core 998
62% 998 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 62%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar 256GB SSD 256GB
132GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.2.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 103 98 61 54 50 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
44.2% Average
Read 269
Write 124
Mixed 168
SusWrite 75.2
35% 159 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 60.9
4K Mixed 18.4
79% 31.5 MB/s
DQ Read 94.6
DQ Write 130
DQ Mixed 109
83% 111 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 44.2%
Great: 240%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
931GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 160 170 170 148 138 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 156
Mixed 90.1
SusWrite 153
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.2
232% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GF2X16QFHH36-135-K 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
36.8% Below average
MC Read 15.2
MC Write 13.9
MC Mixed 13.5
41% 14.2 GB/s
SC Read 4.5
SC Write 6.2
SC Mixed 5.4
15% 5.37 GB/s
Latency 133
30% 133 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B450M Pro4-F R2.0 Builds (Compare 345 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock B450M Pro4-F R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 110% - Outstanding Total price: $115
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $285WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $144
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $70
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback