HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 6% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	5.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	50.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 16GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago, 17 months ago.

System	HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 3047h
Memory	14.2 GB free of 16.0039 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090825
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 20 '22 at 23:55
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 B95 2,408 User benchmarks, average bench 53% XU1 PROCESSOR, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (73^rd percentile)	54.6% Above average	Memory 83 1-Core 44.4 2-Core 87.4 48% 71.6 Pts	4-Core 153 8-Core 163 21% 158 Pts	64-Core 166 10% 166 Pts
Poor: 44% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 720 15,510 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Sanyo(144D 80A8) 1GB CLim: 967 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 376.19 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	5.61% Terrible	Lighting 7 Reflection 5.3 Parallax 8.6 6% 6.97 fps	MRender 4.5 Gravity 7.8 Splatting 7.2 5% 6.5 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 5.61% Great: 6%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Revuahn 900G Blue 120GB 74 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 62GB free (System drive) Firmware: T1125A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 205 207 212 185 83 29 MB/s Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	50.8% Above average	Read 240 Write 189 Mixed 217 SusWrite 153 45% 200 MB/s	4K Read 21.8 4K Write 67.4 4K Mixed 14.9 88% 34.7 MB/s	DQ Read 142 DQ Write 134 DQ Mixed 27.2 51% 101 MB/s
Poor: 45% ↑ This bench: 50.8% Great: 84%
WD500A 500GB 33 User benchmarks, average bench 52% 466GB free Firmware: 05.0AG.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 119 118 119 120 120 120 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	68.4% Good	Read 119 Write 112 Mixed 61.8 SusWrite 119 75% 103 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 1 174% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 68.4% Great: 68%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 CE M378B5273CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5273CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5273CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M378B5273DH0-CH9 52GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333, 0 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 36864 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.3% Below average	MC Read 14.5 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 12.4 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.8 SC Write 6.2 SC Mixed 8.4 20% 7.13 GB/s	Latency 75.2 53% 75.2 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC Builds (Compare 267 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

System: HP Compaq 6005 Pro SFF PC

CPU
Athlon II X2 B24AMDBench 42%, 2,045 samples	53x
Phenom II X4 B95AMDBench 53%, 2,408 samples	44x
Phenom II X4 B97AMDBench 55%, 1,103 samples	22x

GPU
Radeon HD 4200ATIBench 1%, 10,090 samples	150x
GeForce GT 710NvidiaBench 3%, 187,161 samples	17x
GeForce GT 720NvidiaBench 4%, 15,510 samples	7x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	7x
Green 240GB (2018)WD $35Bench 45%, 156,194 samples	6x
A400 120GBKingston $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	6x

RAM
ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G ID:84 B0 OCZ3RPR1333C9LV4G 49GBUnknownBench 33%, 13 samples	4x
ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4M1 37GBUnknownBench 28%, 75 samples	3x
ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 8JTF25664AZ-1G4D1 37GBUnknownBench 29%, 75 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $28

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $165	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16