Jingsha X99M-H2

Performance Results


Gaming 66% Battle cruiser	Desktop 74% Battleship	Workstation 77% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	93% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	242% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Jingsha X99M-H2 (all builds)
Motherboard	SZMZ X99M-G2
Memory	23.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	4096 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200811
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Dec 22 '22 at 01:27
Run Duration	285 Seconds
Run User	COL-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E5-2699 v3 673 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 18 cores, 36 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	67.5% Good	Memory 77.4 1-Core 54.3 2-Core 156 56% 96 Pts	4-Core 310 8-Core 610 54% 460 Pts	64-Core 1,838 114% 1,838 Pts
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 67.5% Great: 78%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Nvidia(10DE 119E) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 527.56 Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	93% Outstanding	Lighting 115 Reflection 176 Parallax 121 94% 137 fps	MRender 109 Gravity 122 Splatting 108 92% 113 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 93% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90 262,559 User benchmarks, average bench 251% 700GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1858 1860 1850 1859 1863 1702 MB/s Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	242% Outstanding	Read 1600 Write 1,909 Mixed 1,693 SusWrite 1,832 398% 1,759 MB/s	4K Read 41.1 4K Write 64.5 4K Mixed 50 160% 51.9 MB/s	DQ Read 439 DQ Write 284 DQ Mixed 378 278% 367 MB/s
Poor: 149% ↑ This bench: 242% Great: 365%
HGST HUS 726060ALE610 6TB 2.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 68 67 67 67 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	51.1% Above average	Read 179 Write 176 Mixed 77.1 SusWrite 66.6 158% 125 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 3.4 4K Mixed 0.9 150% 1.77 MB/s

HGST HUS 726060ALE610 6TB 1.5TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 67 68 67 67 67 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	54.9% Above average	Read 168 Write 177 Mixed 80 SusWrite 66.9 158% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5.1 4K Mixed 0.8 204% 2.3 MB/s

HGST HUS 726060ALE610 6TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 3TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 142 139 137 138 137 138 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	72.5% Very good	Read 184 Write 177 Mixed 75 SusWrite 138 188% 144 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.8 201% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 72.5% Great: 73%
HGST HDN 726060ALE610 6TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 2TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 69 69 68 68 68 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	43.6% Average	Read 164 Write 168 Mixed 77.2 SusWrite 68.3 153% 120 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 1 89% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 43.6% Great: 73%
HGST HUS 726060ALE610 6TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 3.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	54.6% Above average	Read 212 Write 195 Mixed 84.4 SusWrite 34 161% 131 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 5.3 4K Mixed 0.9 215% 2.43 MB/s
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 54.6% Great: 73%
HGST HUS 726060ALE610 6TB 2TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 68 69 69 70 69 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	55.2% Above average	Read 170 Write 170 Mixed 75.9 SusWrite 68.9 155% 121 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 5 4K Mixed 0.8 201% 2.23 MB/s

HGST HUS 726060ALE610 6TB 1TB free, PID null SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 69 69 70 69 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	58.3% Above average	Read 183 Write 175 Mixed 80.6 SusWrite 69 161% 127 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.8 214% 2.37 MB/s

HGST HDN 726060ALE610 6TB 7 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 3.5TB free, PID 0567 Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	35.4% Below average	Read 161 Write 166 Mixed 82 SusWrite 34 140% 111 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 1 86% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 35.4% Great: 73%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMH32GX4M2D3600C18 2x16GB 38,830 User benchmarks, average bench 94% 2 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.2% Good	MC Read 29 MC Write 21.9 MC Mixed 23.3 71% 24.7 GB/s	SC Read 12.8 SC Write 14.9 SC Mixed 16.4 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 85.6 47% 85.6 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 124%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X99M-H2 Builds (Compare 66 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 68%

Battle cruiser

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 68%

Battle cruiser

System: Jingsha X99M-H2

CPU
Xeon E5-2670 v3IntelBench 66%, 3,953 samples	22x
Xeon E5-2620 v3IntelBench 66%, 6,890 samples	11x
Xeon E5-2678 v3IntelBench 71%, 6,301 samples	8x

GPU
RTX 3060Nvidia $283Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	10x
RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples	9x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	3x

SSD
Ultimate SU800 512GBAdata $71Bench 104%, 31,280 samples	5x
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TBBench 70%, 46,239 samples	4x
S500PRO 512GBFanxiangBench 233%, 626 samples	4x

RAM
M393A2G40DB0-CPB 2x16GBSamsungBench 59%, 1,132 samples	10x
36ASF2G72PZ-2G1A2 1x16GBMicronBench 36%, 364 samples	7x
HMA42GR7BJR4N-UH 1x16GBHynixBench 37%, 11 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 73% - Very good

Total price: $355

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16