Today's hottest deals

Asus P7P55-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics6.7% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive68.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P7P55-M  (all builds)
Memory5.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120904
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateDec 31 '22 at 05:49
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (67th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 870-$100
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
73% Very good
Memory 93.1
1-Core 87.9
2-Core 175
71% 119 Pts
4-Core 290
8-Core 397
43% 343 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 73%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 730
Gainward(10B0 1287) 1GB
CLim: 901 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 473.81
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
6.7% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 8.9
Parallax 9.4
7% 8.87 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 7
7% 8.2 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 6.7%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
163GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 217 227 200 241 248 246 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
68.4% Good
Read 263
Write 252
Mixed 251
SusWrite 230
56% 249 MB/s
4K Read 29.5
4K Write 43.3
4K Mixed 37.4
116% 36.7 MB/s
DQ Read 153
DQ Write 178
DQ Mixed 182
132% 171 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 68.4%
Great: 128%
WD WD2500JB-00REA0 250GB-$150
26GB free
Firmware: 20.00K20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 30 18 31 32 32 MB/s
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Read 60.5
Write 28.4
Mixed 27.2
SusWrite 28.5
27% 36.2 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 1
178% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 33%
Toshiba P300 1TB-$34
343GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8R0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 143 141 136 152 164 156 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
87.3% Excellent
Read 156
Write 139
Mixed 39.5
SusWrite 149
87% 121 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
136% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
45.7% Average
MC Read 18.3
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 14.6
44% 15.6 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 11.3
SC Mixed 12.7
35% 12.1 GB/s
Latency 61.8
65% 61.8 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P7P55-M Builds (Compare 261 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P7P55-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $85
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $167Nvidia RTX 4060 $290WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $129
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $406
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback