Today's hottest deals

ECS H81H3-MV

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (83rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 17 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 15 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (79%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardECS H81H3-MV  (all builds)
Memory3.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150529
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateNov 13 '17 at 18:49
Run Duration229 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU 79%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-4160-$120
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
66% Good
Memory 90.2
1-Core 94.7
2-Core 157
69% 114 Pts
4-Core 242
8-Core 256
33% 249 Pts
64-Core 270
17% 270 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 66%
Great: 67%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Nvidia(10DE 1C82) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2088 MHz, MLim: 1809 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 376.33
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
35.7% Below average
Lighting 45.1
Reflection 34.1
Parallax 41.8
37% 40.3 fps
MRender 40.8
Gravity 42.8
Splatting 39.7
34% 41.1 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Revuahn_ 850X1TU256GB 256GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R072 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 519
Write 424
Mixed 255
88% 399 MB/s
4K Read 30.4
4K Write 98.1
4K Mixed 38.1
147% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 283
DQ Mixed 73
111% 208 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 104%
Great: 104%
SSD 128GB
24GB free
Firmware: S9FM Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
23.3% Poor
Read 153
Write 44.4
Mixed 127
24% 108 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 9.41
4K Mixed 2.64
45% 12.1 MB/s
DQ Read 86.5
DQ Write 10
DQ Mixed 2.74
14% 33.1 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 85%
Hitach HDS5C3020ALA632 2TB
847GB free
Firmware: ML6O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
66.1% Good
Read 104
Write 126
Mixed 100
83% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.52
4K Write 1.48
4K Mixed 0.32
85% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 66.1%
Great: 66%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.10 320GB-$80
170GB free
Firmware: 3.AA Max speed: SATA 1.0 150 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 58.9
Write 56.3
Mixed 53.4
42% 56.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.67
4K Mixed 0.26
81% 0.81 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B5173EB0-CK0 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
55.9% Above average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 21.3
MC Mixed 17.4
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 15
SC Write 19.4
SC Mixed 17.1
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 67
60% 67 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.9%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81H3-MV Builds (Compare 35 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: ECS H81H3-MV

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $203
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $210Nvidia RTX 4060 $278WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $84
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $400
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback