Biostar H510MHP

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar H510MHP  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20211125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 20 '23 at 05:11
Run Duration125 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10105F
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 93.1
1-Core 114
2-Core 252
85% 153 Pts
4-Core 404
8-Core 637
64% 520 Pts
64-Core 623
39% 623 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 84%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1630
Nvidia(10DE 169C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 528.02
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
27.9% Poor
Lighting 35.9
Reflection 31.1
Parallax 30.3
29% 32.4 fps
MRender 32
Gravity 30.2
Splatting 30.3
25% 30.8 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN570 NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB
187GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 234100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 191 193 199 200 200 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 1,461
Write 1,072
Mixed 1,182
SusWrite 221
219% 984 MB/s
4K Read 49.1
4K Write 130
4K Mixed 66.2
228% 81.6 MB/s
DQ Read 784
DQ Write 751
DQ Mixed 611
502% 715 MB/s
Poor: 84%
This bench: 177%
Great: 220%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$20
293GB free
Firmware: KC48
SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 120 121 123 122 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
65.9% Good
Read 110
Write 106
Mixed 62
SusWrite 120
73% 99.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.7
126% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CB8GU2666.C8RT 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.8% Average
MC Read 33
MC Write 7.5
MC Mixed 12
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 5.8
SC Mixed 11
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 61.9
65% 61.9 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 49.8%
Great: 94%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 71 59 60 7.2" 1536 801 SAM07D0 SAMSUNG
Typical H510MHP Builds (Compare 263 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Biostar H510MHP

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 84% - Excellent Total price: $250
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback