Asus H110M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics8.75% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive67.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus H110M-K  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210204
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJan 29 '23 at 22:22
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-7100-$38
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
68.1% Good
Memory 89.7
1-Core 112
2-Core 200
78% 134 Pts
4-Core 271
8-Core 275
36% 273 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 33%
This bench: 68.1%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R7 350
PwrHis(1787 3500) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 800 MHz, MLim: 850 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
8.75% Terrible
Lighting 10.8
Reflection 14.5
Parallax 14.8
9% 13.4 fps
MRender 11.2
Gravity 11
Splatting 9.8
9% 10.7 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.75%
Great: 12%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RX7 NVME 512GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V0926A0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 257 282 266 307 327 328 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
67.7% Good
Read 336
Write 282
Mixed 302
SusWrite 294
68% 303 MB/s
4K Read 25.4
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 17.4
87% 30.9 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 227
172% 234 MB/s
Poor: 101%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 254%
Seagate ST1500LM012-1R817G 1.5TB
712GB free
Firmware: SBK2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 102 99 100 97 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
52.9% Above average
Read 83.5
Write 97.9
Mixed 55
SusWrite 99.7
62% 84 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.6
185% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.9%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
CG3200D4M13508G 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
39.1% Below average
MC Read 14.2
MC Write 13.4
MC Mixed 10.9
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 12
SC Mixed 11.9
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 67.7
59% 67.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 39%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M-K Builds (Compare 6,022 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-K

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback