Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PR_FX516PR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 49%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics83.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
15 months ago, 15 months ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PR_FX516PR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX516PR
Memory15 GB free of 24 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210827
Uptime0 Days
Run DateFeb 05 '23 at 16:40
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 48%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11370H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
63.7% Good
Memory 56.3
1-Core 129
2-Core 228
74% 138 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 552
58% 467 Pts
64-Core 609
38% 609 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 63.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 160C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 528.24
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
83.2% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 114
Parallax 100
86% 107 fps
MRender 114
Gravity 85.8
Splatting 87
77% 95.5 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme HFM512GD3JX013N 512GB
65GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,391
Write 1,108
Mixed 1,020
261% 1,173 MB/s
4K Read 43.2
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 58.2
195% 68.3 MB/s
DQ Read 827
DQ Write 367
DQ Mixed 689
486% 628 MB/s
Poor: 137% Great: 313%
Nvme Samsung SSD 980 1TB
530GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 824 982 1082 1183 1231 933 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
187% Outstanding
Read 996
Write 1,036
Mixed 990
SusWrite 1,039
229% 1,015 MB/s
4K Read 40.3
4K Write 103
4K Mixed 54.1
185% 65.7 MB/s
DQ Read 797
DQ Write 369
DQ Mixed 652
465% 606 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 187%
Great: 354%
Seagate Desktop 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 3300
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 37 38 39 36 39 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Read 55.9
Write 25.8
Mixed 17.2
SusWrite 37.3
42% 34 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.4
27% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 Crucial CT16G4SFD832A.M16FRS 24GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 16384 MB
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
50.8% Above average
MC Read 18.4
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 14.9
53% 18.6 GB/s
SC Read 10.8
SC Write 18.8
SC Mixed 12.2
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 139
29% 139 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PR_FX516PR Builds (Compare 2,686 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PR_FX516PR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $171Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback