Today's hottest deals

MSI H110M PRO-D (MS-7996)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7996
MotherboardMSI H110M PRO-D (MS-7996)  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170420
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateFeb 06 '23 at 13:46
Run Duration121 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium G4600-$27
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
67.9% Good
Memory 88.7
1-Core 104
2-Core 177
73% 123 Pts
4-Core 274
8-Core 277
37% 276 Pts
64-Core 277
17% 277 Pts
Poor: 47%
This bench: 67.9%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
MSI(1462 7996) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
3.29% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 5.2
Parallax 6.6
5% 5.93 fps
MRender 0.2
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 0.2
0% 0.23 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.29%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 128GB
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1125A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 52 54 53 41 59 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.9% Poor
Read 249
Write 67
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 63.9
25% 114 MB/s
4K Read 16.3
4K Write 7.3
4K Mixed 1
30% 8.2 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 21.9%
Great: 92%
Toshiba MK3252GSX 320GB-$70
22GB free
Firmware: LV010A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 47 41 46 48 48 48 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
30.4% Below average
Read 59.3
Write 45.5
Mixed 34.5
SusWrite 46.4
34% 46.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.5
99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 30.4%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown D12.2324CH.002 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
65.6% Good
MC Read 24.3
MC Write 24.1
MC Mixed 20.7
66% 23 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 20.3
56% 19.7 GB/s
Latency 68.8
58% 68.8 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 65.6%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H110M PRO-D (MS-7996) Builds (Compare 3,037 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M PRO-D (MS-7996)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $190
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark the gold standard for users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $295WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $111Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $345WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback